Website Accessibility Scores
See how accessible popular websites are. Enter any URL to get a free WCAG compliance audit.
Popular Websites
amazon.com
Not yet scanned
google.com
Not yet scanned
facebook.com
Not yet scanned
twitter.com
Not yet scanned
youtube.com
Not yet scanned
linkedin.com
Not yet scanned
netflix.com
Not yet scanned
apple.com
Not yet scanned
microsoft.com
Not yet scanned
walmart.com
Not yet scanned
target.com
Not yet scanned
ebay.com
10 issues found
reddit.com
Not yet scanned
wikipedia.org
Not yet scanned
nytimes.com
Not yet scanned
cnn.com
Not yet scanned
bbc.com
Not yet scanned
github.com
Not yet scanned
stackoverflow.com
Not yet scanned
shopify.com
Not yet scanned
wordpress.com
Not yet scanned
medium.com
Not yet scanned
instagram.com
Not yet scanned
tiktok.com
Not yet scanned
spotify.com
Not yet scanned
airbnb.com
Not yet scanned
uber.com
Not yet scanned
doordash.com
Not yet scanned
stripe.com
Not yet scanned
zoom.us
Not yet scanned
Recently Scanned
Why Check Website Accessibility?
Web accessibility ensures that websites are usable by everyone, including people with disabilities. The Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.2 provide the international standard that most laws reference, including the ADA, Section 508, the European Accessibility Act (EAA), and EN 301 549.
Accessibility lawsuits are at an all-time high — over 4,000 ADA web accessibility cases were filed in 2023 alone. Proactively testing your website can help you identify and fix issues before they become legal problems.
CompliaScan runs 100+ automated checks based on axe-core, the industry-leading accessibility testing engine used by Microsoft, Google, and the US government. Each scan evaluates your site against WCAG 2.2 Level AA criteria and provides actionable fix instructions.
What does the accessibility score mean?
90-100 (A/A+): Excellent — your site passes most automated accessibility checks. Minor issues may remain that need manual review.
70-89 (B/C): Needs improvement — several accessibility barriers exist. Focus on critical and serious issues first.
50-69 (D): Poor — significant accessibility problems that likely affect many users. Prioritize remediation.
Below 50 (F): Critical — major barriers to access. Immediate action recommended to avoid user harm and legal risk.